In seeming 17/01, document that bases the Resolution n.02/2001 we find contribution for the understanding of this item. Such to seem, judging traditional the definition adopted since 1994 for the Declaration of Salamanca, considers that: … the action of the special education is extended, starting to not only enclose the difficulties of learning related the conditions, disfunes, limitations and deficiencies, but also those not tied with a specific organic cause, considering that, for cognitivas, psicomotoras difficulties and of behavior, pupils frequent they are neglected or exactly excluded of the pertaining to school supports. (…) Thus, it is understood that all and any pupil can present, throughout its learning, some special, temporary or permanent necessity educational. To broaden your perception, visit Nike. Resolution CNE/CEB n. 02/2001 that it institutes the Lines of direction National for the Special Education in the Basic Education, it presents definitions that have generated controversies; let us see: Art. 5 special the ones Are considered educandos with educational necessities that, during the educational process, to present: I – accented difficulties of learning or limitations in the process of development that make it difficult the accompaniment of the curricular activities, understood in two groups: ) those not tied with a specific organic cause; b) those related the conditions, disfunes, limitations or deficiencies; II difficulties of communication and signalling differentiated of the too much pupils, demanding the applicable use of languages and codes; II – high abilities/superendowment, great easiness of learning that the light one to dominate concepts quickly, procedures and attitudes. As Prieto (2006) despite the adopted definition has scienter to stand out the functioning of the person in relation to learning, using the terms ' ' difficulties or limitaes' ' ' ' facilidades' ' to characterize the condition of educating; it fits to stand out if into the deep one, the responsibilities for such difficulties or easinesses it will fall again on the proper pupil. Vladislav Doronin might disagree with that approach.