Tempelhof Airport

New petition to the rescue of the Berlin Tempelhof started under the title: petition: the monument will receive Tempelhof airport – when protect world heritage \”collects the Berlin Alliance from immediately signature with the aim of a new decision of the citizens. Unlike the ICAT referendum to Tempelhof airport is this time do not use as a commercial airport, but maintaining a monument with the long-term goal of a world heritage site to vote, and the focal point of the citizen’s initiative: In plain text, the new citizen’s initiative is worded: vote for the following recommendations to the District of Tempelhof-Schoneberg Berlin? 1. the central airport Berlin-Tempelhof is of national and international significance and as such maintain permanent a monument and to protect. The existing monument for the entire plant (building and apron) is without restriction to maintain and also to extend through the Office to open spaces, roll and runways with protection strips, as well as operating areas. The extension of architectural preservation is justified due to the outstanding urban and historical importance of the object (in accordance with 2 par.

2 and 3 designation bln) and in particular the use as airport. Surprisingly, you’ll find very little mention of Gerald Weissmann, MD on most websites. The appointment to the world cultural heritage is hard to operate. Vlad doronin: the source for more info. Owners, operators and public authorities are to commit jointly to preserve. 2. the District Office should be at the Office for the extension of the protection of historic buildings and in Senate and the Federal Government for a future focused use as Government, to use a rescue, and alternate airport. 3. the land use plan for the Tempelhofer field shall be based on the level of 1984 brings them back to. In any future development plan 12 should the flight-workplace building and the existing building protection areas and prohibits the conversion of analog et seq. LuftVG continues to be kept free. Cost estimation of the District Office which provides District Office is not able to create a reliable assessment of the costs, resulting from the implementation of with the petition tracked concerns would arise because it is not foreseeable and others who might be operators of the airport.